What follows is a quick analysis of the facts of the case and the judgement that has finally been delivered. Sen was arrested on the 14th May, from Bilaspur and Narayan Sanyal was only made an accused in July , who was already an under trial detained in the Bilaspur Jail in another case. The Charge sheet was filed in August, The charges were framed on 27th December, and subsequently the trial began. The trial lasted for two years where 97prosecution witnesses and 12 defence witnesses deposed.
|Published (Last):||22 October 2016|
|PDF File Size:||2.54 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.67 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Brabar This has been accepted by Narayan Sanyal in his defence statement. Doctors across India started holding free clinics for the poor in tribute to the example of Sen and to peacefully campaign for his release. Vs State of Maharashtra 3 Crimes being different from the present case, the accused cannot get any benefits from these. Sen was awarded the R. Not applicable Accused Dr. Media reports said that no evidence of sedition binayal been produced against the accused by sdn Chhattisgarh Government.
Amita and Shankar are hard core Naxalites. Special public prosecutor argued that all accused should be sfn with the maximum penalty. The police had carried out the seizures from him of letter relating to Narayan Sanyal and the order book as per seizure memo Exhibit P These applications are shown as Exhibit P 27 to Exhibit P But the point to understand here is the law of sedition that Sen was accused of, the evidence brought to court, and whether the evidence supports the charge.
He should be released immediately. The witness further said that the police asked him for the list of people meeting undertrial Narayan Sanyal. The seizure memo in this regard, and certified copies of the Peoples War magazine and Prabhat magazine were brought by him. Convicted by Trial courtreleased on Bail pending Appeal. He examined all the documents intensively and with due diligence. On the judgeemnt of the above investigation, facts are established that the accused Binayaj Sanyal and the accused Pijush Guha and Dr.
Binayak Sen has had 33 meetings with Sanyal in prison. You are commenting using your Twitter account. This witness further testified that on Arguments from both the sides were considered. Dr Binayak Sen found guilty of sedition, gets life imprisonment India News — Times of India It must also be mentioned here that during the recording of evidence by prosecution witnesses, they were not asked specific questions about the said contradictions and made to confront the Investigating Officer and sem the accused cannot get the benefit of the said argument.
Views Read Edit View history. This was not accepted by the witnesses. Copy of the seizure memo is Exhibit C. While dictating his answer he had said that the accused Pijush Guha was arrested from Station Road on Similarly, it is also not established that the accused Pijush Guha and Dr. Sen was also physically examined before he left the prison. The seizure memo, Exhibit P 67, has his signature on it.
The above testimony of this witness was not challenged by the accused during cross-examination. The Director of Rupantar organization is Ilina Sen. In particular, that he had carried letters for a jailed Maoist ideologue, Narayan Sanyal.
In their presence, the seal was broken and Ilina Sen opened the lock. He staffed a hospital created by and funded by impoverished mine workers, and he has spent his lifetime educating people about health practices and civil liberties—providing information binayka has saved lives and improved conditions for thousands of people.
But defence witnesses Sheshank Sharma, Ajit Parmar, Anil Jha and Sukant Rajput all accepted during cross examination that they were not correspondents and they did not themselves give aforementioned news items to the newspapers for publishing. Related Articles
Critiquing The Binayak Sen Judgement
Brabar This has been accepted by Narayan Sanyal in his defence statement. Doctors across India started holding free clinics for the poor in tribute to the example of Sen and to peacefully campaign for his release. Vs State of Maharashtra 3 Crimes being different from the present case, the accused cannot get any benefits from these. Sen was awarded the R.
BINAYAK SEN JUDGEMENT PDF
Daily News and Analysis. Binayak Sen — Wikipedia It was in English and in another language which he could not understand. The bench passed the order despite counsel for Dr. Exhibit P shows judge,ent call detail format.
- IRF531 DATASHEET PDF
- THE SIXTH MAN BY DAVID BALDACCI PDF
- HONORATO DE BALZAC LA PIEL DE ZAPA PDF
- DEL CIELO Y DEL INFIERNO SWEDENBORG PDF
- DE PERDEDOR A SEDUCTOR JACK THE RIPPER EDICIN 2 PDF
- BS EN 12811-1 PDF
- BON DE RETOUR PIXMANIA PDF
- CHUSHINGURA THE TREASURY OF LOYAL RETAINERS PDF
- DESCARGAR LIBRO TEORIA DE CIRCUITOS BOYLESTAD PDF