Out of his pages, [Lifton] unbelievably devotes no more than 6 or 7 full pages, if that, to [Lee Harvey] Oswald. Bugliosi David S. Kennedy" spells out a fantastically-absurd theory of casket-switching, body-snatching, and head-altering surgery that was supposedly performed on the badly-damaged cranium of assassinated President John F. Because anyone who has closely or even not-so-closely studied the physical evidence in the JFK murder case will be easily able to debunk Mr. It just simply could not possibly have happened, period. Did these plotters actually fire a 6.
|Country:||United Arab Emirates|
|Published (Last):||4 June 2017|
|PDF File Size:||8.86 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||10.36 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Out of his pages, [Lifton] unbelievably devotes no more than 6 or 7 full pages, if that, to [Lee Harvey] Oswald. Bugliosi David S. Kennedy" spells out a fantastically-absurd theory of casket-switching, body-snatching, and head-altering surgery that was supposedly performed on the badly-damaged cranium of assassinated President John F. Because anyone who has closely or even not-so-closely studied the physical evidence in the JFK murder case will be easily able to debunk Mr.
It just simply could not possibly have happened, period. Did these plotters actually fire a 6. If not, how did that small entry wound get there at the official autopsy? Of course, this nutty scenario is not even remotely possible -- unless Jacqueline Kennedy herself was one of the main conspirators. And other JFK aides were right there with the casket during that short period when Jackie was away from it.
Just try to picture this scenario in your mind if you can do so while laughing hysterically at the same time : Holding a constant vigil from Dallas to Washington, Mrs.
Kennedy and God knows how many others aboard the aircraft , John F. JFK is now transferred to the pinkish or gray casket so that he can be whisked away by the plotters to an unknown location for conspiratorial surgical purposes. The band of conspirators now must load something that weighs pounds into the now-empty bronze casket, to simulate the weight of JFK.
This activity, too, goes completely unnoticed by the dozens of people aboard and guarding! And evidently Mrs. Literally beyond belief! In fact several of us were with it through the whole trip, all the way to Bethesda Naval Hospital. Not even thirty seconds. I never left it. So, certain conspiracy-seeking individuals on the outer fringes of Planet Earth will simply ignore the obvious flaws in their theories and continue to put forth mindless conspiracy scenarios that never could have occurred in a million years.
After all, why bother believing the above words of somebody who was actually right THERE on the airplane on November 22nd The late Mr. JFK arrived at Bethesda in a cheap "shipping" casket. The dead President was inside a "body bag" when he arrived at Bethesda for the autopsy. But Mr. For, how on this Earth could such complicated body-altering head surgery on the dead President have possibly occurred in such a short space of time, at God knows what location the "Conspiracy Bat Cave" perhaps?
Sounds like something better-suited for the script of a Saturday-morning Warner Brothers cartoon. In short, either all three primary autopsy doctors James J. Humes, J. Thornton Boswell, and Pierre A. Finck are crooked, lying Governmental cover-up agents David S. But is that very likely either? Larry M. Sturdivan is a wound ballistics expert and researcher, who testified extensively at the HSCA hearings in the late s during the U.
Sturdivan which I just typed out in the above paragraph. He has apparently rearranged his theory quite a bit since his large tome "Best Evidence" was published in And today, that is when I think that event actually occurred.
How they got the body off the plane is another matter. Lifton; November 15, So, in essence, if one theory is proven wrong -- then just move on to the next best one and see if another cat will lick this one up. Utter bunk. Tippit as well. David Von Pein.
This book opened my eyes - and not just about the JFK assassination. It would take me a little while longer to learn to distrust every single thing the government tells me, but David Lifton definitely I was probably thirteen or so when I first came across this book in my local bookstore. It would take me a little while longer to learn to distrust every single thing the government tells me, but David Lifton definitely succeeded in convincing me that the truth about the JFK assassination was not to be found in the Warren Report. All these years later, Best Evidence remains a must-read for those searching for the truth about the events that took place in Dealey Plaza almost fifty years ago. As crowded as the field of books on this subject has grown, this book remains unique in a number of ways.
The main purpose in making this film was to document, on video, the basic accounts of the key witnesses that appear in Best Evidence, accounts I had received via telephone interviews. It was Marshall McLuhan who said: The medium is the message. Some background may be in order here. The manuscript for Best Evidence was submitted on April 1, Wounds had been altered; and bullets removed. At Bethesda, the body no longer reflected the true "medical facts.
He quit his aerospace job, devoting all his time to the Kennedy assassination. Lee Harvey Oswald. Lifton had acquired these photos after the initial publication of Best Evidence, from a former Secret Service employee who had made private copies with the permission of Agent Roy Kellerman. Lifton claims that the actual photographs are consistent with his thesis of body alteration. Summary[ edit ] Best Evidence is written in the first-person as a chronological narrative of his year search for the truth about the Kennedy assassination. It is not written just as a theory of what took place on November 22, , but also to highlight his personal quest to solve the puzzle through a meticulous and time-consuming search for new evidence that could finally resolve the many factual conflicts in the record. He details evidence—using both the Warren Commission documents and original research and interviews with those involved at both Dallas and Bethesda—of a stark and radical change between the descriptions of the wounds by the medical staff at Dallas and those at Bethesda.